Trending topics
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.

Demetri Kofinas
I get you access to the people & ideas that matter so that you can learn to build financial wealth and always stay ahead of the curve | Host of @HiddenForcesPod
What a convenient time to post this.

DNI Tulsi GabbardJul 19, 02:10
🧵 Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our democratic republic. Here’s how:

5K
Does the vice president actually believe in anything? Or is everything just about power and political expediency?


JD VanceJul 18, 07:53
Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bullshit. The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it.
Where is this letter? Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it? Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?
9.09K
It's crazy that of all the things, it's this one that has caused the president his first real scandal.
Not the grabbing them by the pussy, the meme coins, or the numerous other pay-to-play initiatives.
It's covering up for Epstein's sex trafficking and intel network that risks costing the president his coalition.

PolymarketJul 17, 01:29
BREAKING: President Trump considering appointing special prosecutor to investigate the Epstein files.
7.17K
Scott's right. The future of the country hangs in the balance, but he's got the line of causality flipped.
The willingness of this administration to run a protection racket for people in positions of power engaged in openly criminal acts is turning us into a banana republic.

Scott AdamsJul 13, 20:11
If you see the Epstein story as a crime story, which of course it is, you probably favor maximum disclosure of everyone and everything involved, including innocent people, like a typical court case.
If you see the Epstein story as something bigger, involving more than one nation, you might see it as a Commander in Chief issue, meaning the public is not meant to have the full story, similar to most national defense issues. We elect a president to decide -- in part -- what the public can safely see.
Would you favor full disclosure if you knew it would derail a peace negotiation?
Would you favor full disclosure if you knew it would end Republican control of Congress and plunge the country back into a Democrat open-border hellscape?
If you can't say what you would give up to get the full Epstein disclosure you crave, you're not a serious person.
11.84K
Demetri Kofinas reposted
They aren't even hiding it anymore.
NASDAQ futures start *aggressively* selling off at 7:52 PM (green circle) for no reason whatsoever.
Trump announces tariffs on Canada, Europe, and the rest of the world at 8:06 PM (blue circle).
NASDAQ bottoms *4 minutes* later at 8:10 PM (red circle).
You don't even need room temperature IQ to figure out what is happening over here.

1.66M
Top
Ranking
Favorites
Trending onchain
Trending on X
Recent top fundings
Most notable