1 - Anthropic - more importantly the org structure works for the future 2 - OpenAI - + 1.5 months - took in too many B players from Meta and now has org chart issues 3 - Google - + 2 months - team is cranking but it’s not life or death issue so 🤷‍♀️ 4 - Meta/xAI - 6/7 months behind 5 - Chinese firms - 9 months behind, constrained by chip access Anthropic and OpenAI are clearly nearing recursive self improvement. Google, Meta, xAI stuck. - Demis believes in real science, language models are not the path to AGI but if HQ requires language models so be it - Meta, xAI - trying to catch up desperately but far
Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀
Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀Mar 13, 10:53
Based on the data I see, I think: - Anthropic🇺🇸/Google🇺🇸/OpenAI🇺🇸 all ~tied - Meta🇺🇸 / xAI🇺🇸 each ~7mo behind - Moonshot🇨🇳/- Deepseek🇨🇳 / zAI 🇨🇳 / Alibaba🇨🇳each ~9mo behind - Mistral🇫🇷 ~1.5 years behind - No other companies competitive
@Happyjuss @chrisprucha just FYI like 90% of my portfolio is in Nvidia but still.. I don’t think the CUDA moat stands
913