There is no such thing as a low-energy rich country.

You would fail a college student if they wrote this on an exam and yet the NYT publishes it as if it’s insightful

There's so much handwaving about how "AI will cure cancer" or "AI will revolution science" What we need are more specific, actionable ideas for how AI could accelerate science & security Dropping next week: @IFP will publish 15 "AI for science" ideas from experts.

60% of the American companies on Fortune's list of top AI innovators have an immigrant founder. The world’s top talent overwhelmingly wants to come to US. This is a incredible advantage. American leadership in AI depends on allowing, even encouraging, high-skilled immigration.

Meta pays hundreds of millions for top tech talent while we shut down the high-skilled immigration pathways and research institutions which create them

Thinking about this observation from @tylercowen again:

1. Wind and solar both keep me up at night, but for opposite reasons. Solar works and is winning the global race, Britain simply sits too far north to benefit. Britain is betting on wind instead, yet wind lacks the very traits that makes solar work.

This one is burned into my brain

Shooting ourselves in the foot again. You can’t say your goal is “energy dominance” and then throw a bunch of procedure & red tape at the fastest growing sources of energy generation in the country.

It is a major policy failure that the US cannot accommodate top AI conferences due to visa issues.