Kaito Leaderboard Framework [Correction] I tested whether you actually read and understand my content And you failed miserably! All of you! I included an error (on purpose) by flipping the axis labels in the figure and the text Here you find the corrected version (all results hold through, it's just about the labelling). I also added some additional details to the graph. ----- This framework combines the Kaito Leaderboard Strength (horizontal dimension) with the projects' 30D Mindshare (vertical dimension) I scale each dimension from 100% to -100% relative to their median An (best-practice) example: Infinex has the highest 30D Mindshare (4.81%) which is transformed to 100%. At the same time, Infinex has the second highest Leaderboard Strength (1,453 average Yaps) which is 52.6% on the relative scale. I sort all pre-TGE projects into four quadrants based on their relative Mindshare and Leaderboard Strength The best position is Quadrant I: it contains the projects with relatively high Mindshare and Leaderboard Strength Quadrant II includes projects with relatively high Mindshare but relatively low Leaderboard Strength. These projects are able to activate their rather mid-size and smaller yappers to achieve a strong outcome. Quadrant III combine relatively low Mindshare with a relatively strong Leaderboard. Projects attracted larger yappers but those may not post often or impactful enough. Quadrant IV include projects with relatively low Mindshare and Leaderboard Strength. The most problematic combination. Find the data for the four quadrants in the original thread Note that the current results are based on only one snapshot and rather serve as an illustrative example ----- On a serious note: this happens if you do the 5 am routine and had too little sleep while crafting your posts