this commentary comes off as in bad faith
you’re well within your rights to be miffed that some rando with a n-of-1 experiment saved his dog (regardless for how long) instead of genuflecting to academics every step of the way (understandable if you yourself have played by the rules for years!)
but why pretend that right-to-try regulations don’t exist, or sidestep the point that this is exciting to people precisely because many now feel empowered to create their own anti-cancer vaccines?