. @okx Web DEX finally has a signature-free function. When I was beating the dog before, I always missed the best opportunity to place an order because of the few seconds I signed it, but now I can finally place an order quickly.

When web3 is widely adopted, the necessary compromises will still exist—regulations and restrictions will likely continue to follow traditional patterns. As a fan of the original work, I am certainly looking forward to adaptations, but I also don't have high hopes because the audience for TV dramas includes not only us original fans but also regular TV viewers, directors, and production teams. Their aesthetic may not align with that of the original fans. Even if the original author is invited to participate in the production, commercial considerations may lead to certain concessions. Unless there is a strong commitment and the right director and production team are found, most adaptations are unlikely to be very successful, at least from my perspective. Isn't web3 facing a similar situation?

When web3 is widely adopted, many compromises will need to be made—the necessary regulations and restrictions will likely follow traditional patterns. As a fan of the original work, I am certainly looking forward to adaptations, but I also don't have high hopes because the audience for TV dramas includes not only us original fans but also regular TV viewers, and the aesthetics of the directors can be quite different. Even if the original author is invited to participate in the production, commercial considerations may lead to certain concessions. Unless there is a strong commitment and the right director and production team are found, most adaptations are unlikely to succeed, at least from my perspective. Isn't web3 facing a similar situation?

When web3 is widely adopted, the necessary compromises will still exist—regulations and restrictions will likely follow traditional patterns. As a fan of the original work, I am certainly looking forward to adaptations, but I also don't have high hopes because the audience for TV dramas includes not only us original fans but also regular TV viewers, and the aesthetics of the directors can differ significantly. Even if the original author is invited to participate in the production, commercial considerations may lead to certain concessions. Unless there is a strong commitment and the right director and production team are found, most adaptations are unlikely to succeed, at least from my perspective. Isn't web3 facing a similar situation?

When web3 is widely adopted, many compromises will need to be made—regulations and restrictions will likely follow traditional models as usual. As a fan of the original work, I am certainly looking forward to adaptations, but I also don't have high hopes because the audience for TV dramas includes not only us original fans but also regular TV viewers, and the aesthetics of the directors can be quite different. Even if the original author is invited to participate in the production, there may still be certain concessions made due to commercial considerations. Unless there is a strong commitment and the right director and production team are found, most adaptations are unlikely to be very successful, at least from my perspective. Isn't web3 facing a similar situation?

There is nothing wrong with AI writing articles. I am using it myself. The problem lies in the "information increment." In the past, we scrolled through Twitter to obtain information. But now, more and more content is produced quickly by AI, with the goal not being the quality of information, but rather the quantity—more posts, more exposure, more rewards. When "writing more" becomes the main KPI, "what was said" becomes unimportant. What we are currently criticizing is actually the proliferation of AI content with no incremental information, not AI itself. My judgment at the beginning of the year was that the channels for obtaining information in this cycle are changing; people are no longer relying on VC research reports or media, but are treating Twitter as their main source of information. But looking back now, there are problems with Twitter as an information source. The posting frequency is high, and the noise is great. When everyone wants to jump on the bandwagon and be the "first to post," our efficiency in obtaining information is actually declining. Perhaps, useful content is being drowned out instead. This has led to several trends: > Creators are being forced to go to other platforms, such as Binance Square, @Sidekick_Labs; > Users are starting to return to private domains, private messages, and community circles. So, when people say that Twitter's traffic has decreased recently, it is not an illusion. It is not that the platform has a bug, but rather that its information density is genuinely declining.

A bit of a Ha person, Zora's token creation number has surpassed PumpFun and Letsbonk. In addition, I looked at the meme mcap on the head in the range of 5-10m.

I don't know if it's my delusion, I feel that zora content token is very popular overseas, but no one in the Chinese-speaking area is playing it for the time being?

I feel that there are fewer and fewer living people on Twitter in Chinese-speaking areas recently...

I have a question about infofi: When all content information can be priced, is the value of the information itself higher or lower?