re: "revenue meta" metas only appear when there is an underlying imbalance: some hidden pocket of advantage that participants exploit before everyone else catches on. you see those imbalances where regulation or other frictions slow the market’s self‑correcting force, letting the edge linger long enough to become “the meta”. revenue, though, is already the market’s end state. customers pay for real value, sellers charge what the market will bear, and that feedback loop drives everything toward equilibrium. there is no asymmetry to game and no loophole to close, so calling it a revenue meta is a category error. once the only way to win is to deliver value people willingly buy, the meta is over and balance has been restored.