man it's crazy we have to say things like "teams generating revenue on top of solana is not bad actually" you will not shame a team into making different financial decisions with *revenue they earned on their own* — they will always do what's best for their business and this is what you should want — you should want businesses to optimize for their own needs, this is literally how capitalism works if you can provide a platform where businesses can optimize for their own needs and succeed, then in return you get a platform with non-fungible state/liquidity/network effects and you make it more valuable long-term as a blockchain, really all you can do is make it as easy as possible for teams to succeed on your platform help them scale, help them build, and help them win if you do this, you maximize free market competition which means users have more options to express their preferences if users want to support different types of launchpads with different tokenomics etc, then they can do that and then the collective set of users aka the market decides it is entirely a voting machine for user preferences if you think there's a much better way of doing something, that's a great starting point for building a new startup
Zhu Su
Zhu Su17.7. klo 00.32
Why pumpfun tge is bullish for sol 1) pf actually doesnt own any sol, it is not like they can dump loads 2) it is a false mental framework to say that pf “dumps sol” in general. Users start w usd, buy sol to join the trenches, pay sol fees, platform sells back to usd. This is just consumer business 3) more attention on revenue generation occurring on solana is insanely bullish for the native asset of the venue that it is occurring on, both in terms of forward looking attraction of founders and rerating of it as an investment grade consumer protocol 4) solana aligned investors who bought the ico will tp to sol
25,59K