The gain or loss of power comes from paying attention to, adapting to and grasping the changes in consensus, rather than working hard in a single dimension and blindly using brute force. Unless your brute force is strong enough for one person to change the consensus of a complex network, which is not possible by default in the vast majority of cases. Be sensitive to changes in consensus, and be obtuse with details that cannot be changed locally. But the change in consensus is more abstract and unclear to the general audience, so it will establish a false and stubborn correlation between what the superior did on the surface before he took power and the power itself. Then I tried to follow the example of the East for the rest of my life and did a lot of useless work.