This is another crypto index ETP, and it's also been stayed pursuant to Rule 431 (same as Grayscale's Digital Large Cap) to review the delegated authority order. I have to wonder what is going on at the SEC. I can excuse GDLC as an unforeseen unilateral Crenshaw wrench, but this shouldn't happen again here. So either (1) they again approved under delegated authority knowing Crenshaw would throw another wrench -- perhaps so GDLC wasn't penalized by the first wrench or (2) this (and GDLC) was planned by the Commission as an end-around the 240-day statutory period. Both explanations are the kind of funny business that shouldn't really be happening under Atkins.