This morning, the tokenomics was released, and at that moment, Theoriq @TheoriqAI chose to open the "whole scroll" and "splash ink" to write down the future. The tokenomics of $THQ is not just about distribution logic; it’s more like an opening note of a set of execution rules. Behavior determines weight, and only by stepping in layer by layer can one truly enter the operational mode of Agentic. From now on, everything about @TheoriqAI will begin to establish order around $THQ. ____🦘____💰____🦘____💰____🦘____💰____ $THQ has no rehearsal; it goes straight into action. @TheoriqAI does not intend to optimize the user experience; it directly places the agents in the position to execute on-chain. Who adjusts the strategy, who allocates the treasury, and how the ecosystems collaborate are no longer decided by the project team, but are truly executed by the agents. $THQ does not recognize holdings; it recognizes actions like stake, lock-up, and delegation. By personally participating in the next round, one can gain weight and opportunities within this system. ____🦘____💰____🦘____💰____🦘____💰____ The distribution structure is written with "restraint," and the incentive system is solid. $THQ has a total supply of one billion, with 30% allocated to capital, locked for three years and released gradually, 24% belongs to the development team, released linearly over three years, and the remaining 18% is allocated to the community, covering everyone from users to agent operators. The remaining 28% is kept in the treasury to refine strategies and build collaborations. Incentives do not rely on expectations but on the actual operational output of agents. Each time the protocol is called, and each round executed, it will feed back into this cycle, ensuring that every participation can be "traceable." ____🦘____💰____🦘____💰____🦘____💰____ Weight is accumulated through behavior, not by holding posture. sTHQ is fundamental; it forms the safety net of the protocol; locking it into αTHQ increases participation level, not just changing the returns, but also raising the responsibilities. When you delegate to an agent, the system grants it execution authority, and returns are distributed proportionally; however, if an error occurs, αTHQ will be reduced, and your previously locked sTHQ will also be disposed of. What truly influences the direction of the system is whether users continue to participate.