Why IMO Bad Bunnz will receive far more ecosystem rewards than Fluffles ↓ Bad Bunnz is a tradable NFT, allowing big accounts to scale their exposure to MegaETH as they see fit. Fluffles, by contrast, are deeply decentralized and soulbound with 5,000 wallets (soon 10,000 which makes it impossible for whales to accumulate meaningful positions vs. only 1,500 wallets / 3000 NFTs for Bad Bunnz Take @legendarygainz_, for example: he holds 2% of Bad Bunnz, but maybe just 0.1% of Fluffles. Naturally, he’ll prefer receiving airdrops and perks via Bad Bunnz and he’s not alone. Other high-mindshare holders include @0itsali0, @Tyler_Did_It, @BCheque1, @ghost93_x, @nics_off, and @FrenchieNFTeam. Airdrops & WL aren't just about rewards, they’re about attention and marketing. You want to reward the loudest, most visible users, the ones who shape narratives and amplify momentum. And nothing is more powerful than tradable NFTs held by people who could exit anytime, but don’t because they believe in it. These are the types of holders who generate impressions, defend floors, and keep mindshare alive. By giving rewards/utilities to - Bad Bunnz, you reach the more vocal people on the MegaETH timeline proportionally to their conviction in the chain. - Fluffles, you distribute rewards equally to people who might believe in MegaETH on a high level, but aren’t actively onchain or trenching.

he holds 2% of Bad Bunnz* well just wait a few days