On the real though, from a TA perspective this would be the best case scenario: A leading diagonal has 5 subwaves but unlike a traditional impulse they DO overlap and the subwaves are 3 legged, corrective structures. This makes these moves tricky to trust because they look corrective by default. Invalidation for this "best case" would be the original which is basically at our lows and right above the inefficiency, so the bottom is either in and the next leg up has begun (albeit in a non-traditional way), OR we will invalidate this idea and finally get a test of the inefficiency below. Let's see what we get 🍿 $CRV