I’ve been around long enough to see Web2 take creators for a ride, but barely any value returning to the original voice behind it. So when I first discovered @campnetworkxyz, I saw a different blueprint for the internet. Here’s what clicked for me: Camp treats content as intellectual property ▸ A tweet? A remixable asset. ▸ A song? A source of royalties. ▸ Even a meme? Registered and protected, with attribution built in by default. ➥ And that one shift treating everything we make online as ownable We’ve lived in a world where AI models scrape the internet for data, artists get copied without credit, and platforms make billions off user content without sending a dime back. With Camp, they're raising a question: “What if you could register everything you create, prove it's yours, and let others build on it while you still earn from every remix, every reuse, every interaction?” ➥ That’s not just fair. That’s powerful. In real life, this could shift the creator economy. Imagine: ▸ A 17-year-old rapper in Manila posts a verse → 3 years later it’s remixed in 5 languages → she’s still earning. ▸ A Vietnamese designer shares a meme template → used in 100 campaigns → he gets a cut each time. ▸ A poet uploads a short piece → an AI model trains on it → attribution sends credit and revenue back to the source. ➥ That’s what onchain attribution enables. Camp is an infrastructure for creative economies, backed by attribution, not speculation. With Camp, we stop renting attention and start building ownership. That’s why I keep sharing about them.. Because if they get it right, Camp won’t just change Web3. It’ll change how we value expression itself