Our StableSurge hook just dominated during the increased volumes on $USDf 🔥 Lower TVL and volume but way higher fees, outperforming Uniswap and Curve 📈 This is the power of risk-adjusted rewards. Let's compare 🧵

The metrics speak for themselves. Curve’s $USDC / $USDf pool saw 23x more volume than Balancer’s $GHO / $USDf… Yet it only generated almost half the fees. That’s hook efficiency in action 👇

Against the Uniswap pool, the difference is even bigger. Despite handling ~18x less volume, Balancer’s $GHO / $USDf pool managed to generate around 7x more fees than Uniswap’s $USDT / $USDf pair. StableSurge clearly doing his job 👇

How does 15x less volume = 7x higher fees? StableSurge's asymmetric fee scaling during imbalance ⚡ When $USDf's price deviated from the peg, the hook calculated: surgeFee = baseFee + (maxFee - baseFee) × (imbalance - threshold) / (1 - threshold)

Destabilizing trades paid escalating fees up to maximum, while peg-restoring trades paid base rate only. Fee scales linearly with pool deviation from target balance, creating natural arbitrage incentives while maximizing LP compensation during stress periods 🎯