disclaimer: don't have a bag here, don't agree with the way launchcoin has handled things, probably don't even think it's the right form for ICM BUT the replies to this thread do show something that isn't nearly well talked about outside of certain folks (doing God's work): the lack of legal awareness yes we have been hit with a wave of deregulation, BUT that doesn't mean you can just do everything and get away with it the look back period for certain behaviors is often longer than the current presidency/terms of congress and some things that CT want people to do just aren't possible on compressed time horizons because they require careful, careful planning for things that may happen years from now, not on the 1D chart it also goes double for founders; a lot of founders enter the space thinking they can sort of just do whatever, and get hit with (hopefully) a reality check by counsel that the way you handle i.e. new mechanism implementation, the structuring etc. DO matter and matter a lot longer than most people's time horizons it's not a matter of *sucking* at legal, but that things take time, getting good lawyers around you takes time, figuring out the risk profile you're willing to take TAKES TIME (and unfortunately, can't always require full transparency) it's always better to think of this stuff DAY 1, else you get stuff like hastily set up foundations, delayed product releases/issuances, and even things that cross the line none of this is an excuse for stringing on the community and going silent due to poor preparation (what happened here), but the reality is operating time horizons often do not equal trading time horizons (its also sort of why a lot of @a1lon9's answers on @notthreadguy's stream were vague, there are things you just cannot talk about from a financial reg standpoint publicly) anyways, again see the disclaimer, but its worth a shout
Ben Pasternak
Ben Pasternak24.7. klo 05.47
I've been doing a bad job recently with regard to transparency, public trust, and community alignment. That’s on me. It’s been greatly requested that we provide more transparency related to our pending flywheel (FW). When Believe’s volume surged in May, I didn’t even know what a flywheel was. Honestly, we simply weren’t prepared to be one of the leading platforms in the space. I had to move fast and surround myself with people who had experience launching similar mechanisms at scale. Believe is now working with a team widely regarded as the best in the space for this kind of work (we’re intentionally not naming them here). To launch a flywheel in a compliant way, a specific corporate structure is required. Setting up that structure involves several prerequisites that are being expedited as much as possible. We’re now in the final innings of the process. If I knew what I know now, candidly we would have waited to launch a coin, so that we could have a FW from Day 1. I know that this has been a painfully long experience for our community and that we’ve been very poor on communication. I apologize for that. The lack of communication has damaged the trust that people have placed in us. It is on us to earn your trust back, and it will take time to do so. Once our flywheel is live, I believe it will set the gold standard for what’s expected from crypto projects. Every project with a live coin should have an attached flywheel—it’s the obvious future. Thanks to all for the input so far. We’re still so early.
44,07K