Populaire onderwerpen
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
Ik klaag vaak over hoe 99% van de aandacht binnenkort LLM-aandacht zal zijn in plaats van menselijke aandacht. Hoe ziet een onderzoeksartikel eruit voor een LLM in plaats van voor een mens? Het is zeker geen pdf. Er is een enorme ruimte voor een extreem waardevolle "onderzoeksapp" die dit uitzoekt.

10 jul, 22:47
I'm constantly irritated that I don't have time to read the torrent of cool papers coming faster and faster from amazing people in relevant fields. Other scientists have the same issue and have no time to read most of my lengthy conceptual papers either. So whom are we writing these papers for?
I guess, at least until they fall in to the same issue from their own work, AI's will be the only ones who actually have the bandwidth to read all this stuff. I'm not specifically talking about today's language models - let's assume we mean whatever inevitable AI shows up, that is able to read the literature and have impact on the research (whether by talking to humans or by running lab automation/robot scientist platforms).
So then: how should we be writing, knowing that a lot of our audience will be AI (plus cyborgs, hybrots, augmented humans, etc.)? Maybe it's too early to know what to do, but we better start thinking about it because assuming our audience will always be today's humans seems untenable. Taking seriously the idea that someday the impactful audience will be very different, and that the things we write now are in some sense a training set for truly diverse future beings, how does our writing change? or does it?
what say you @danfaggella @mpshanahan @Plinz @blaiseaguera ?
498,11K
Boven
Positie
Favorieten