Let me explain further: In decades past, S&P was more or less a discounting mechanism for future cash flows used by the wealthy as an alternative to cash-flow producing opportunities available in private markets and elsewhere. That is no longer the case. The passage of MAGA accounts cements the S&P as a new pension scheme for the US. This transition began with the institution of the 401(k) and continues to this day. The S&P 500 is, in a very real sense, a new public good. It is backed by Congress and the Executive. It is also backed by the Fed. All of this creates a very real different return profile from the past. Looking at it and saying a 17 P/E sounds right is ludicrous. Given it's now explicit and implicit gov't backing, its role as the modern-day pension scheme, and its fundamental de facto backing of the bond market, means it deserves a much higher multiple, in the 20s if not 30s. People who ignore all these true yet exogenous facts regarding the markets, and insist on trying to analyze them from 20th century principles, are dinosaurs and not worth of your attention.
Mel Mattison
Mel Mattison7.7. klo 22.42
I am so sick of people thinking that the price of the S&P is some ridiculous result of non-sensical behavior driven by passive flows and no rational basis. All these people that have called everything wrong, instead of stating that we have moved into some mode of irrationality, should look in the mirror and question their own "rationality." The truth is, the market has been behaving imminently rationally. P/Es should be going up. Rates out the curve should be going down. And so on. It is only the very limited and outdated orthodoxy of many "smart" people that is leading them to dismiss these moves as non-sensical. They are operating from completely wrongheaded first principles, driving them into despair to explain, and continually leading them to inaccurate conclusions.
73,17K