Trendaavat aiheet
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
I think Pasternak is a terrible crypto founder and that his strategy and communication are terrible, but I don't think anyone here is considering the legal implications of doing a flywheel at all. Especially from a tax perspective. If they don't have the right legal setup, it's possible to get stuck in a world in which:
> They buy back the token
> The token has a big drawdown at some point
> Tax obligations > Revenue
> ggwp for the company, everything goes to zero and they have to FSH the token on the open market. Tokenholders get zero'd out
It's probably in your best interest as a token holder that they have the right legal setup for this
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, just a kid from Africa

24.7. klo 05.58
disclaimer: don't have a bag here, don't agree with the way launchcoin has handled things, probably don't even think it's the right form for ICM
BUT
the replies to this thread do show something that isn't nearly well talked about outside of certain folks (doing God's work): the lack of legal awareness
yes we have been hit with a wave of deregulation, BUT that doesn't mean you can just do everything and get away with it
the look back period for certain behaviors is often longer than the current presidency/terms of congress and some things that CT want people to do just aren't possible on compressed time horizons because they require careful, careful planning for things that may happen years from now, not on the 1D chart
it also goes double for founders; a lot of founders enter the space thinking they can sort of just do whatever, and get hit with (hopefully) a reality check by counsel that the way you handle i.e. new mechanism implementation, the structuring etc. DO matter and matter a lot longer than most people's time horizons
it's not a matter of *sucking* at legal, but that things take time, getting good lawyers around you takes time, figuring out the risk profile you're willing to take TAKES TIME (and unfortunately, can't always require full transparency)
it's always better to think of this stuff DAY 1, else you get stuff like hastily set up foundations, delayed product releases/issuances, and even things that cross the line
none of this is an excuse for stringing on the community and going silent due to poor preparation (what happened here), but the reality is operating time horizons often do not equal trading time horizons (its also sort of why a lot of @a1lon9's answers on @notthreadguy's stream were vague, there are things you just cannot talk about from a financial reg standpoint publicly)
anyways, again see the disclaimer, but its worth a shout
67,45K
Johtavat
Rankkaus
Suosikit