No need for much explanation about the strong players. I didn't expect that the 100M target for this week would be achieved by Tuesday by @druzbtc. Originally, $pythia could have surged to 100M last night, but there were many retail investors taking profits at this position. In this situation, there was still a net inflow of 1.18M yesterday, which basically indicates stability. For me, it doesn't matter what kind of brain or machine it is; these are just stories. I only focus on the most important indicator, which is the strategy of the strong players. I told @0xCryptoWing that such sincere strong players are really rare. They won't disappoint you even on the four-hour chart; basically, as long as there are profits, they will quickly buy back. If even such sincere strong players can't make big money, then there's really nothing that can be done. I think after the game at the 100M position, it's highly likely to continue going up, and many who should sell have sold almost all. Let's set a new target of 200M for the week. 🤣

I've heard a lot of things said by the big players, and most of it is just nonsense, because the market and the big players are essentially opposing forces. For example, if the market-making funds are prepared with a few million, and the big player is very strong, then they add a little to the pool, making you all hold on, and then they frame it out. Fries @0xCryptoFries used the OKX wallet API to analyze the capital inflow situation, and in the past five days, the net inflow has been 316,000. Now the $pythia pool is already over 10 million. I was chatting with @druzbtc about how if the pool were half the size, the market cap would have been 200-300 million already. He said it’s fine, if the pool is small, the whales won’t play. Sometimes you shouldn’t just listen to what the big players say, but rather watch what they do. When the two are inconsistent, please take the price as the standard.

I originally sold $pythia at 35M, but recently I thought about it and decided to chase it back all the way. I basically don't understand this coin at all, and I spent almost 10M in funds to get it here. I reflected on it, and I realized that not understanding it might not be the issue of the market makers, but rather my own issue. Everyone thinks about how the market makers can exit after such a pump; either they are not focused on this, or they are just foolish money. I choose to believe they are not focused on this, and I hope it reaches 100M by next week. 🤣

My own habit is to occasionally follow up on the progress of projects I've invested in or focused on, to see if it aligns with my initial judgment. The Mira project was analyzed by Messari in May, listed on Kaito in June, and just recently launched on the Verify system this month, maintaining a very steady pace. I took a look at this system, and its practical value is maximized. For example, in the image below, if you don't know, you wouldn't even realize where the problem lies in this statement, even those who have been in the crypto space for a long time might get confused. Because at that time, Satoshi Nakamoto indeed received a reward of 50 bitcoins, but only transferred 10 of them to the cryptographer Hal Finney. This is the value of Mira's Verify system, which verifies the authenticity and accuracy of AI-generated content through multiple models, then annotates it, and provides an API interface for plug-and-play. This is another powerful tool for creators who rely on AI-generated content.

I don't intend to judge the right or wrong of gaining followers; after all, everyone has their own choices. Using this to create more negotiation space with the project team is understandable, but in the long run, the one who is most easily deceived may not be others, but yourself. When gaining followers becomes so easy, it can make you stop putting in the effort to think about what the essence of doing Twitter well really is. It will take you further away from the truth and further away from your true self.

Many people believe in fatalism, and I personally believe in fate as well, but why should we still strive? In my view, fate is the factory setting, while fortune is something you can strive for. Your factory setting is not something you can decide. Some people are born in Rome, starting at a very high point, which is indeed something that cannot be chosen or changed. But the meaning of effort lies in determining whether you can touch the upper limit of your own destiny. For example, some people's range of destiny might be 1–10, while others might be 10–50. If you don't put in the effort, you might forever stay at 1 or 10; but if you work hard enough, you can get close to the limit of 10, or even reach the ceiling of 50. The meaning of effort is to bring you as close as possible to the upper limit of your destiny, achieving your own extreme.

Muscle reactions formed when starting a new team after years of entrepreneurship: Is the business model viable? Does it align with long-termism? What kind of talent does this business model require? What qualities and abilities should partners possess? What are my own strengths, and what positions am I suited for? How should the organization be divided, is the organizational structure modular, and does it have future scalability? What kind of pace is suitable for the current stage, fast or slow?

In the short term, it's about luck; in the long term, it's about skill. The most attractive aspect of poker is that in the short term, luck plays a huge role, easily giving people the illusion that they can win. That's why so many players are willing to play this game continuously. If you lose every day, you lose interest in playing. But in the long run, luck will always revert to the mean. Ultimately, it comes down to skill and whether your trading model has made positive EV decisions.

If a person wants to cross classes, he may need to break through these steps. The original family, the original environment, break through the language restrictions, break through the national borders, and break through your subconscious. One is the original family, many people are greatly affected by their parents' cognition, if this cognition itself has greater limitations, it will become an invisible shackle in your growth process. The second is the native environment, I grew up in a third-tier city, and I am deeply touched by the lack of resources in small places. This sense of deprivation is actually more likely to motivate the evil of human nature. First-tier cities have preliminarily screened people through urban dividends, and it is easier for you to make high-quality friends. The third is language restrictions, you have to break through national boundaries and go out to see what other people's cultures are like, so that you can make comparisons, and you will not only be superstitious about one voice, so that you can look at many things from a global perspective and find many arbitrage opportunities. For example, in the currency circle, there are many overseas friends who continue to carry out geographical and language arbitrage based on their understanding of different countries and language advantages, and this information gap will always exist. The fourth is to break through the subconscious, no matter what stage you are in, the most important thing is to fully understand yourself, which is also a lifelong topic. Many times I think I am making rational choices, but in fact, I am subconsciously driven and decided. If you really want to break through, you must first be constantly aware of yourself, and then recognize your subconscious bug, and gradually fix it.

A friend asked me, how can I get promoted faster by working part-time? Although I have never worked part-time, as a serial entrepreneur, I probably know better than many people what kind of people my boss likes to promote. First of all, the mindset needs to change: you have to think from the perspective of the leader, and you can think about what the boss thinks. Because when you switch to the boss's perspective, many complex problems will become simpler, and the work results will be qualitatively improved. More importantly, you will shift from the mentality of how much you do and how much you take to what is important, take more, and focus on creating value and amplifying results. On top of this, it is necessary to have three core competencies: be able to do things, be a person, and be able to show. Able to do things. Choose quantifiable work with clear results, solve practical problems with professional ability, and deliver results, so that the boss will really notice you. Will be a man. Be sincere and don't play tricks. You will not forget your roots if you can trust you and support you to go up. At the same time, try to minimize other people's jealousy of you, and the hidden resistance of jealousy can sometimes be very powerful. will show. Don't be complacent about yourself, you feel good does not mean that the company/leader feels valuable, you have to take the initiative to let others see, understand and recognize your results, so that your value can be recognized. In the final analysis, the workplace is nothing more than two things: people and things. If you can still resonate with the boss, then you can not only be seen, but also be placed in a more important position and go further.