Imagine you're a small account. You make a banger thread about a project, it does insanely well. Loads of engagements, loads of likes. Perfect. This post should contribute to mindshare, but a botted spam account posts at the same time and does even better, it steals all your mindshare. Later on, the mindshare in the leaderboard is removed from spam bot account. But....that stolen mindshare is not returned to you. What happens to the integrity of mindshare + leaderboards in this instance. Mindshare MUST be retroactively rewarded to users it was stolen from. Otherwise, it's more beneficial for users to post frequent but low effort content to gain mindshare. Otherwise the people posting infrequent but informative, long-form and content will never gain mindshare - why? Because they risk hitting a mindshare 'black hole' where earned mindshare is wrongly rewarded and then deleted forever. This is a big problem for @KaitoAI IMO.
Picolas Cage
Picolas Cage26.7. klo 19.37
My biggest concern with the InfoFi meta + Kaito is relating to mindshare. I've seen numerous leaderboards get swamped with fake, botted accounts spamming useless content who gain huge mindshare very quickly. Now, the teams + @KaitoAI have done a great job at finding these people and reducing their mindshare accordingly - but there's something that has been bugging me and I'd actually love a response from @0xWenMoon or @Punk9277 Let's say I post a great piece of content on Saturday at 1PM - and it does really well, maybe gets 100 likes, some RT's, bookmarks etc. and this continues for 12 hours. Typically that type of post would gain good mindshare, because out of all the content being posted for that leaderboard at that time, a lot of the mindshare was spent on that post. Now, let's say at the exact same time, a botted account posts a low quality post with zero effort or content - and this post also does well for the same time period (Saturday 1PM for 12 hours) - this botted and low quality post might do really well in terms of metrics and engagement and steal your mindshare for that time period. Consequently, the original post would technically have less mindshare, because according to the algo the other low quality post, which was running at the same time as yours, gained more engagement and thus more mindshare. My big question is, in this scenario above, even if bad actors are removed from the leader boards: 'Is mindshare retroactively rewarded to the content creators who were robbed of the mindshare?' Or, does your mindshare essentially stay static and you earn no mindshare, despite producing a good post? My worry is that it's not enough to simply remove mindshare from the bad actors - you need to redistribute that mindshare to the people who were robbed of that mindshare from that time period. I really hope I've explained this properly. It's quite difficult to get my thoughts across. Because recently I've been writing posts which have increasingly better engagement on all metrics (I'm tracking them) and my mindshare is struggling. I can't help but feel like I'm being robbed of mindshare because I essentially have 'black spots' of time where I can't earn mindshare - and this is impacting me the most because I like to post long form pieces of useful content less regularly than others who can post more regularly. People who post more regularly seem to be avoiding these 'black spots' and thus gaining mindshare unfairly. I honestly feel this is a big issue. Would love some clarification. Has anyone else noticed this?
@0xWenMoon
Stuff like this brother. It was 3-5 guys all operating 1 twitter just absolutely spamming the timeline with 'GM' with a caldera poster behind them saying nothing. All fake botted replies but generating massive mindshare. The team even removed the account from the mindshare. There's targetted botted accounts doing this now - i'm not talking about people who's content is just abit runnish, I mean systematic bad actors
Picolas Cage
Picolas Cage24.7. klo 23.07
The @turtledotxyz Kaito leaderboard is being aggressively farmed by suspicious accounts generating useless content but farming massive engagement. First time I've actually felt bearish on the InfoFi meta. 'crepto solutions' is ranked 1st place this week with 1.5% mindshare behind massive accounts like @Nofuturephoto and @eli5_defi who post consistently good, high quality content. I think @KaitoAI need to fix their algorithm to ensure real content creators are getting the recognition and rewards they deserve.
10,31K